National Council of Women of Canada - Blog

A Blog gives you current information and items of inerest. The National Council of Women of Canada (NCWC) has done two blogs on the meetings of the Commission on the Status of Women, 2010, and 2011. We are continuing now with a blog, on a range of topics of interst to members and the public. The NCWC has a very complete web site where you can learn more about the history and members of Council.

A blog (a blend of the term web log) is a type of or part of a website. Blogs are usually maintained by an individual with regular entries of commentary, descriptions of events, or other material such as graphics or video. Entries are commonly displayed in reverse-chronological order.

Most blogs (including this one) are interactive, allowing visitors to leave comments and even message each other via widgets on the blogs and it is this interactivity that distinguishes them from other static websites

Many blogs provide commentary or news on a particular subject. A typical blog combines text, images, and links to other blogs, web pates, and other media related to its topic. The ability of readers to leave comments in an interactive format is an important part of many blogs.

As of 16 February 2011 (2011 -02-16), there were over 156 million public blogs in existence.

The above from Wikipedia!

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Fact Sheet - Women and Poverty

The National Council of Women of Canada is a member of the Ad hoc Coalition for Women's Equality and Human Rights which has just issued Fact Sheets that are important sources of information for this 2011 Election. Here is the one on Women and Poverty.

Women and Poverty

Women continue to be among the poorest of the poor in Canada. The risk of poverty is greatest if you are an Aboriginal woman, a recent immigrant, a woman living with disabilities, a single mother, or a senior woman living alone. Paid work is not yet a reliable pathway out of poverty for women.

The Government of Canada has yet to establish a poverty reduction strategy that directly addresses women's and child poverty. Women living in poverty need concrete action.

What does women's poverty in Canada look like?

Pay Inequity:
In 2007, a Canadian woman's annual income was only 63% of that of a man's. In 2008, on average, a Canadian woman earned 71 cents for every dollar a man earned - a decrease of 7 cents since 1999.

Child Poverty:
When women are poor, children are poor. Almost one in nine children and their families lived in poverty (defined as the 2008 Low Income Cut Off After-tax). One in four children in First Nations communities grow up in poverty.

Precarious Employment:
Women account for 60% of minimum wage workers, and minimum wage rates in most provinces are less than $10 an hour. 40% of women work in precarious jobs with no benefits, no pension, and little or no job security.

Employment Insurance:
Only 39% of unemployed women receive employment insurance, compared to 45% of unemployed men.

Political Will and Poverty Women's poverty in Canada is not inevitable. Governments choose whether or not to allocate public funds for social infrastructure that prevents poverty. Stable and sufficient funding for adequate social assistance, affordable child care, transportation and housing, and access to decent work can all help reduce women's poverty.

The Government of Canada has not committed to a federal strategy that would proactively reduce poverty levels by investing in social infrastructure. Women in Canada continue to experience poverty due to low wages for work, lack of paid work, inaccessible child care and transportation, unaffordable housing, and the experience of ongoing discrimination and violence.

Welfare Cuts Hurt Women Cuts to social assistance rates have hit women hard - especially single mothers and Aboriginal women. Welfare incomes received by these women are so low that the National Council of Welfare Chairperson called them "shameful and morally unsustainable in a rich country."

Social assistance programs lack national standards, and rates have remained unchanged in seven provinces and territories in the past year. In four provinces and territories, rates have risen by only 1-3%.

The poverty rate is at 36% for Aboriginal women; 29% for racialized women; 23% for immigrant women and 26% for women with disabilities. Single mothers had an after-tax poverty rate of 35.6% in 2004. Shockingly, 46.5% of senior women living alone are poor.

* This analysis is based on public information available as of March 2, 2011.

Consider asking your candidate the following questions:

Q. Does your political party have a policy to ensure Canadians have a living wage?
Q. Has your political party taken steps to address the feminization of poverty?

Support for Family Caregivers

Canadian Health Charities urge Federal Political Parties to Recognize and Support Family Caregivers

Canada Newswire

Mon Apr 4 2011, 10:45am ET

April 5 is Family Caregiver Day

OTTAWA, April 4 /CNW/ - Health charities and coalitions from across Canada have come together to pay tribute to family caregivers - the often invisible workforce that can be called to duty on a moment's notice. "On behalf of all who are, have been, or will be, involved in caregiving responsibilities, we ask our political leaders to use their influence to give voice and recognition to this important social issue," says Deirdre Freiheit, Executive Director, Health Charities Coalition of Canada.

"Governments have a vital role to play in raising awareness about the importance of caregiving and in establishing measures to better support this crucial group of people who contribute so much to our society," says Sharon Baxter, Executive Director, Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association (CHPCA). "Family caregivers face very real challenges in accessing services, balancing responsibilities, supporting loved ones and maintaining their own wellbeing."

According to a February 2011 survey conducted by the Canadian Cancer Society, 84 percent of Canadians say increased financial support for family caregivers should be a priority healthcare issue in the federal election. "Many caregivers suffer financial difficulties as they deplete personal savings and take unpaid time off from work to care for a family member," says Dan Demers, Director, Public Issues, Canadian Cancer Society. "Canadians are greatly concerned about this issue and are looking to our federal political parties for solutions."

"Financial support for those who must take time off work is a critical component of effective policy for family caregivers," says Nadine Henningsen, Canadian Caregiver Coalition (CCC) President. "It is an important element of a Family Caregiver Strategy that the CCC believes is essential to engage all levels of government and sectors of society to support family caregivers." The intensity and length of caregiving can be significant, with 60% of caregivers providing care for more than three years.

The CCC's Caregiving Strategy includes:

Safeguarding the health and wellbeing of family caregivers and increasing the flexibility and availability of respite care

Minimizing excessive financial burden placed on family caregivers

Enabling access to user friendly information and education

Creating flexible workplace environments that respect caregiving obligations

Investing in research on family caregiving as a foundation for evidence-informed decision making.

The health charities and coalitions commit to working with all parties to shed light on the important work of family caregivers and to taking action to ensure that their contribution is noticed.

BACKGROUNDER for: Canadian Health Charities urge Federal Political Parties to Recognize and Support Family Caregivers

Caregivers and the Compassionate Care Benefit Program

Facts about caregivers:

According to Statistics Canada, between 2002 and 2007, the number of family caregivers in Canada aged 45 years and older increased by 30 per cent (over 670,000 people). In 2007, the number of family caregivers aged 45 years and older was 2.7 million

In 2009, the cost to replace family caregivers with members of the paid workforce at market rates (entitled to benefits, vacation, supervisory support, education etc.) in Canada was estimated to be between $25-26 billion (based on adults aged 45 and greater caring for those 65 years and older with long term health or physical limitations). (Hollander M, et al (2009) Who Cares and How Much? The imputed economic contribution to the Canadian healthcare system of middle-aged and older unpaid caregivers providing care to the elderly)

According to the CHPCA, more than 259,000 Canadians die each year, and most die in old age. With the aging of our population, by 2026, the number of Canadians dying each year will increase by 40% to 330,000. Each of those deaths affects, on average, five other people - family and loved ones who care for others.

A 2007 survey of health care in Canada (Health Care in Canada Survey 2007) suggests that 41% of Canadians use personal savings to support themselves when caring for loved ones at the end of life and 22% of these individuals miss one or more months of work.

A 2009 study published in Palliative Medicine (Costs associated with resource utilization during the palliative phase of care: a Canadian perspective) indicates that Canadian families frequently shoulder 25% of the total cost of palliative care due to costs associated with home-based services such as nursing and personal care services.

An Ipsos Reid study in 2004 showed that Canadians age 55+ estimated caring for a dying loved one at home was approximately 60 hours a week and approximately two thirds of Canadians said they could not devote the estimated number of hours per week to take care of a dying loved one given their current schedule.

In its August 2010 study, CIHI reported that nearly 20,000 family caregivers (16%) of seniors receiving home care reported distress related to their role. The rates of distress were significantly higher among those - Providing more than 21 hours of care per week (28%) and - Caring for seniors with symptoms of depression (32%).

About the Compassionate Care Benefit

The Compassionate Care Benefit (CCB) is part of Canada's Employment Insurance program. Successful CCB applicants can receive up to 55% of their average insured earnings, to a maximum of $413/week, over a six-week period to care for a family member at risk of death within 6 months. The six weeks of income assistance can be taken at once, broken down into one-week periods spread over six months or shared between family members. Applicants must meet the designation of "family member" (or a significant person who is considered to be 'like family') and provide a medical certificate from the doctor of the gravely ill family member indicating that death is imminent (i.e., within 6 months).

Facts related to the CCB:

In order to qualify, applicants must have worked a minimum of 600 EI-insurable hours over the preceding 52 weeks and be able to demonstrate that regular weekly earnings from work have decreased by more than 40 percent.

The CCB only covers six weeks, with a two-week waiting period, with no extensions for illnesses with a longer trajectory to death. The two-week waiting period can be challenging for low-income Canadians or those who are already experiencing financial difficulty due to the loss of income from a dying spouse.

The application process can be quite complicated for caregivers with a limited education or language barriers. As well, having the medical certificate filled out properly has been recognized as a barrier to a complete and successful application.

In a 2007 study, respondents who had applied for the benefit (whether successful or not) repeatedly cited difficulty accessing reliable and accurate information from a variety of sources, including websites and government offices. It also does not appear to be well-known to Canadians, particularly at the point of care, where this information would be most useful. (The Information Transfer and Knowledge Acquisition Geographies of Family Caregivers: An Analysis of Canada's Compassionate Care Benefit (Valorie A. Crooks, Allison Williams, Kelli I. Stajduhar, Diane E. Allan, and S. Robin Cohen)

Canadians may believe that health care is 'free' (or at the very least covered by taxes), however the cost of care for drugs, home-based services and other expenses can be staggering. Canadian families frequently shoulder 25% of the total cost of palliative care due to costs associated with home-based services such as nursing and personal care services (Costs associated with resource utilization during the palliative phase of care: a Canadian perspective, Palliative Medicine, Dec 2009).

The CCB can be particularly difficult for caregivers who are caring for patients with an uncertain trajectory of death, such as a child with a life-limiting illness. PedPalNet, a consortium of researchers working in pediatric end of life care, is currently studying parents who are caring for a child with a life-limiting illness to better understand their stress over time and the factors that help them survive through this experience (see: (www.pallpedsnet.ca?) for more information).

Canadian Cancer Society

Canadian Cancer Society fights cancer by doing everything we can to prevent cancer, save lives and support people living with cancer. Join the fight! Go to www.ifightcancer.ca to find out how you can help. When you want to know more about cancer, visit our website at cancer.ca or call our toll-free bilingual Cancer Information Service at 1 888 939-3333.

Soci?t? canadienne du cancer combat cette maladie en faisant tout ce qu'elle peut pour pr?venir le cancer, sauver des vies et soutenir les personnes qui en sont atteintes. Joignez le combat! Consultez www.combatpourlavie.ca pour savoir comment vous pouvez aider. Pour en savoir plus sur le cancer, veuillez consulter notre site Web ? l'adresse www.cancer.ca ou appelez notre Service d'information sur le cancer, un service gratuit et bilingue, au 1 888 939-3333.

Canadian Caregiver Coalition

Canadian Caregiver Coalition is a diverse group of national and provincial organizations from across Canada that works collaboratively to represent and promote the needs and interests of family caregivers with all levels of government, and the community. www.ccc-ccan.ca.

Coalition canadienne des aidantes et aidants naturels regroupe divers organismes nationaux et provinciaux, d'un bout ? l'autre du pays, afin de repr?senter et promouvoir d'une mani?re collaborative les besoins et int?r?ts des aidantes et aidants membres de la famille aupr?s de tous les ordres de gouvernement et de la collectivit?. www.ccc-ccan.ca

Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association

Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association (CHPCA) is the national voice for hospice palliative care in Canada. It is a bilingual, national charitable non-profit association whose mission is the pursuit of excellence in care for persons approaching death so that the burdens of suffering, loneliness and grief are lessened.

Association canadienne de soins palliatifs (ACSP) est la voix nationale du mouvement des soins palliatifs au Canada. Il s'agit d'une association bilingue, nationale et ? but non lucratif dont la mission est la recherche de l'excellence dans les soins aux personnes approchant de la mort, afin de soulager le fardeau de la souffrance, de la solitude et de la peine.

Health Charities Coalition of Canada

HCCC, a member based organization, is dedicated to advocating for sound public policy on health issues and promoting the highest quality health research. HCCC strives for excellence in health policy and seeks to ensure that the federal government and policy makers look to the Coalition and its members for timely advice and leadership on major health issues of concern to Canadians; and that they recognize the competence, commitment and contributions of health charities in improving the health and well-being of Canadians.

An open letter from the YWCA


AN OPEN LETTER ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN &  THE LONG GUN REGISTRY
FROM YWCA CANADA

To:
The Right Honourable Stephen Harper, Prime Minister
The Honourable Michael Ignatieff, Leader of the Opposition
Mr. Gilles Duceppe, Leader of the Bloc Quebecois
Mr. Jack Layton, Leader of the NDP
Ms. Elizabeth May, Leader of the Green Party


Violence against women is a $4 billion problem in this country. Every year, 100,000 women and children leave their homes fleeing violence and abuse. Almost 20,000 of those come through the doors of the 31 shelters operated by YWCAs across Canada looking for safety, for a roof over their heads, for care and support.

As the nation’s largest single provider of shelter to women and children fleeing violence, YWCA Canada knows the long gun registry is a public safety tool that makes women’s lives safer. Across the country, our shelters tell us the long gun registry is useful and needed. Our rural shelters tell us police consult the long gun registry every time they go to a domestic violence incident. These are not automatic checks, but deliberate and specific searches for the presence of firearms in the home, especially long guns.

Among service providers working in violence against women there is no rural-urban divide on the registry. YWCA Canada’s national network of shelters is urban and rural, and includes Sudbury, Niagara Region, Brandon, Prince Albert, Lethbridge, Peterborough, St. Thomas-Elgin, Saskatoon, Banff, Yellowknife and Iqaluit, where shot guns and rifles are part of the culture. In every province and territory, the shelter and transition house associations support the long gun registry.

Why? Because shot guns and rifles are the guns most commonly used in spousal homicides, and especially when women are the victims. Not handguns. Shot guns and rifles. In the last decade, 71% of spousal homicides committed with a firearm involved a shot gun or a rifle.

Women’s voices from rural Canada tell the tale. Lyda Fuller, Executive Director of YWCA Yellowknife, which operates shelters in Yellowknife and Fort Smith for women and children fleeing violence, reports that, “Women have told us that the guns used here in the North predominantly for hunting – that is, long guns – are also used to intimidate, subdue and control them.  We hear this over and over again, in small communities without RCMP and in larger communities with RCMP. Women do not want these guns to be unregistered, but do not feel safe expressing this opinion other than in whispers to people who may be able to voice these ‘unpopular’ opinions and who may be heard.”

When YWCA Canada addressed the House Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, Lyda Fuller said, “Please make it clear that it is not city-born, city living folks who are asking for this registry to continue; it is the voices of northern women who fear for their lives and their mental health who are asking for protection.  We see women who have experienced years of brutal intimidation. These women cannot safely express their need for protection themselves, and it is up to Canada to understand this and respond in an appropriate way.”

Dismantling the long gun registry would not serve the interests of women and children vulnerable to violence.  It would put them and the police services who respond to domestic violence at greater risk.

As a nation, it’s time to listen.

Sincerely,

Paulette Senior,
CEO, YWCA Canada

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Not sure about the political party you support? Try this -

The CBC has something fun to try - Vote Compass!
Vote Compass is a free online application that provides users with a sense of how their opinions square with the platforms of the political parties running in the 2011 Canadian federal election.  Based on their responses to a series of statements, Vote Compass calculates a user’s position in the political landscape and shows them the respective positions of the various parties running in the election.

I tried it - it's quite interesting in the range of questions - try it and see what you think.

Friday, April 1, 2011

Just the Facts - on the Gun Registry

We should be supporting those MPs who supported retaining Canada's Gun Registry. Yes, it could be better, but not eliminated.

 In 1995, Canada passed the Firearms Act, requiring all gun owners to obtain a renewable license and register all firearms once. Canada's gun laws are recognized internationally as an effective tool to reduce gun violence. Last September, we saved the gun registry by a mere two votes.

The evidence is clear, the gun registry is effective, efficient both in cost and function, and most importantly, saves lives.

* Most firearm-related deaths in Canada are caused by rifles or shotguns. All guns are lethal, and any gun in the wrong hands is dangerous. We need controls on ALL guns.
* Although there is more opposition to gun control in rural areas and in the Western provinces, there are also higher rates of gun death in those areas. While many gun owners oppose gun control, the vast majority of people living with gun owners support the legislation, especially women living in rural areas.
* A recent poll has shown that two thirds of Canadians support the gun registry. Even in rural areas, supporters equal opponents. Although they are less vocal, the majority of rural women support the registry.
* According to the RCMP, abolishing the long gun registry would save between $1.5 and $4 million per year. These costs are dwarfed by those incurred as a result of firearm death and injury (estimated at $6.6 billion per year in 1995).
* Canada's gun control law is supported by police, women's safety, public safety and crime prevention experts, public health groups, victims, and most Canadians.
"In the next election if we can succeed in turfing a large number of the turncoat Liberal and NDP MPs who abandoned us when we needed them it will serve as a warning to others that gun owners are a group that can no longer be ignored. In the U.S., the NRA has exploited the voting power of gun owners to great effect and particularly in closely contested races Republicans and Democrats often both clamour for the support of the NRA which regularly sees 80%+ of its endorsed candidates elected. (...)" from The Sporting Clubs of Niagara Newsletter, Vol 16, No 4.

It's been quite a week

This has been the first week of the election - what i've noticed is -
  • Harper saying he wants a one on one debate, and then changing his mind. Also, why not Elizabeth May in the leadership debate? But that is the media, not the leader's decision. This has to be agreed to well before the next election - just what the rules are.
  • Then, the Liberal annoucnement about child care - yes it might cost money, but aren't our children worth it? We should all be paying our fair share of taxes. I liked Jeffrey Simpson's article on income splitting, printed here on the Blog. 
  • A visual impression that sticks in my mind is yesterday with Harper's announcement regarding the funding for Newfoundland - not the announcment, but the fact all the media were behind a fence! Yes, they were at the back of the space, behind a fence, and could ask 4 questions. When the first one asked, why 4 questions? Harper said, well OK, we'll make it 5.  I thought something is seriously wrong with this - if the media can't ask questions, we are in trouble. 
 The above are personal thoughts from the administrator.

    More on Income splitting

    April 1, 2011

    Tories' income splitting another nail in tax coffin

    By JEFFREY SIMPSON
    From Friday's Globe and Mail

    The Conservatives are all about targeting the 'middle-class family,' whatever the economic consequences. Sound policy once again flies out the window in favour of political expediency

    Some day, presumably years from now, a federal government will clean up some of the damage the Harper Conservatives have done to our tax system.
    Ideally, a tax system should be simple, fair and progressive. It should encourage savings and investment, and try to treat everyone in the same income bracket in the same fashion.
    The Conservatives have made some moves that accommodate these principles, as in creating the Tax-Free Savings Account, available to all and designed to encourage savings. But their philosophy of using the tax system to achieve social objectives and, most important, their own political objectives, has left the system pockmarked with all sorts of inefficiencies that some later government will have to eliminate.
    Essentially, the Conservatives have used the tax system to lower taxes in the least effective way possible. They have targeted specific groups they want to attract politically, then offer tax advantages.
    The worst offence, of course, was cutting the GST by two points at a cost of $12-billion instead of reducing personal and corporate income taxes that would have stimulated investment and savings. But, for entirely political reasons, the Conservatives chose the GST cut because it was more visible and, they hoped, politically attractive.
    The latest offence is the promise to allow income splitting of up to $50,000 for families with children. This is supposed to happen in four years when the deficit is eliminated (most objective observers believe deficit elimination will take longer.) Since the income scheme will cost at least $2.5-billion, it will erode the surplus Ottawa needs to start paying down debt incurred in the recession, but, hey, who cares about that in this campaign? Moreover, this old Reform Party idea was rejected by a parliamentary committee in 1998 as unfair, regressive and costly ($4-billion). The Department of Finance also studied the idea and thoroughly debunked it, as it would presumably do today.
    Income splitting does nothing for single parents or the poor. It assists wealthier families with one person working, since they can save about $6,000. What looks on the surface to be fair is actually a regressive tax policy that treats taxpayers differently, helping the rich more than the poor and one kind of family more than another - which is why very few Western industrialized countries allow this policy.
    Income splitting as proposed by the Conservatives is also a dumb policy because it favours women staying at home rather than encouraging those who want to join the work force at a time when Canada needs more people working to support the increasing number of retirees.
    But the Conservatives are all about targeting the "middle-class family," whatever the economic consequences. Sound policy once again flies out the window in favour of political expediency.
    The same thing happened since the first Conservative election, with targeted tax credits for income splitting for seniors ($920-million), transit users ($145-million), apprentices' tools, truckers' lunches, child-care payments ($1.5-billion), and children's sports enrolment ($115-million). Adding up these tax changes amounts to perhaps $17-billion. Sensible tax policy would scrap this and use the money to lower personal income taxes and to target special payments to low-income people. The result would fairer, simpler and more effective.
    Speaking of the poor, whatever happened to them? They're everywhere in Canada, except in election campaigns and federal budgets. The only subcategory of the poor that commands political attention is low-income seniors, to which all parties have made promises. As for the rest of the poor, parties barely even mention them. Even the NDP, which used to campaign in favour of "low and moderate income" Canadians, now talks incessantly about the "middle class."
    Again, the reasons are political. The poor vote less than the more affluent; young people vote less than older people. "Middle class" is presumably what the poor aspire to become. A whole lot of more affluent Canadians appear to want to put the poor out of sight and out of mind to the greatest extent possible, starting with aboriginals.
    If you haven't got much income to split to begin with, income splitting won't help you. Instead, there are a myriad of better ways of assisting low-income Canadians, assuming any political party really cared.